There have been many reasons given for the war in Kosova and many people will be forgiven when they have witnessed the deep red glow of the aftermath of the bombing, that this is somehow Armageddon.
The first reason that we will give for the war is that the EAST is incredibly jealous of the WEST. Most of the world is now well aware that Britain is Ephraim of the old testament and that America is Manasseh.
The east is fully aware that the GOD of the great universe has blessed Britain and America beyond their wildest dreams AND THE EAST WANTS PART OF THE ACTION.
Another reason is that Islam wants to take over the west and they have used Kosova as a platform.
Slobo wants to keep control of Kosova because there is "Gold in them thar `ills" and of course Kosova is a natural fortress. Montenegro is also an- oil- way- sea gate which Slobo wants to have control over.
Yet another is, has the war been started to take British minds off the Great European Fraud problem, and off Monica?
One of the biggest questions that come up in the minds of the people of the EAST is "What has the British and the Americans done to have been given so much unprecedented materialistic wealth?" The Jews haven't got it. Only Britain and America.
Bill Clinton's (and Tony Blair's ) actions in Kosova have incensed the people of the EAST.
The people of the EAST realise that it is the God of the west that has given the west its vast material wealth and the likes of Bill Clinton and Tony Blair does not publically state that it is God that has done it. Such statements that we must develop "family" values are intoned for public consumption.
Modern day Christians should know by now that they are Jacob of the Old Testament. This
is understood by the fact that Christ said to the disciples (Matt 10:6) to go to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. Christianity came to Britain first just under 2000 years ago. Just over 100 years ago it became recognised that we were Jacob of old. This is explained in Allen's Identity book (also refer Cd no.53). Yair Davidy e-mail britam@actcom.il Covers the same material. It was the vast British Empire that produced the great missionary work and the main Philadelphian Church work.
There are many Christians in Britain and America that know that we are now becoming a bunch of hypocrites.
Isaiah 10:5, O Assyrian, the rod of mine anger, and the staff in their hand is mine indignation. I will send him against an hypocritical nation. And against the people of my wroth will I give him charge, to take the spoil. And to take the prey, and to tread them down like the mire of the streets .
Germany is modern day Assyria. Yair Davidy covers these points.
The word hypocrite means an actor.
The war in Kosova is ostensibly to prevent Slobo from doing his ethnic cleansing of the people of Islam.
This infers that we in the west would not do such an evil thing. No no no no no!
Many people in the west are aware that we are doing exactly the same type of thing in Iraq. We have virtually annihilated the people of Iraq by constant bombing . But that isn't getting into the papers is it?
The people of Britain do not want involvement in Kosova and there have been many large demonstrations outside the BBC (Babylonian broadcasting corporation) saying stop. But the BBC have only given out the information that Tony Blair, who speaks of course doesn't he on behalf of we British!!!, says we must stop the evil Slobo.
The British politicians say that Slobo must obey United Nations Resolutions. The Palestinian Israelis have broken them for years. Oh what a bunch of hypocrites we are.
God is about to correct our backsliding. He is allowing us to backslide (gonorrhea is out of control) on our own accord because we have rejected him and trusted in and listened to our politicians which we in the west know are a bunch of liars. He is going to allow Britain and America to become the most hated of all nations.
Matt 24:9 Then shall they deliver you up so be afflicted, and shall kill you and ye shall be hated of all nations for my names sake
When the hatred of Britain and America has built up, and just before the main attack we will have the BEAM UP (1 Thes 4:17) of the 144,000 and Britain and America will be attacked and enslaved for a short period of time. Many are going to die.
Jer 30:7 Alas! For that day is great, so that none is like it: it is even the time of Jacobs; trouble: but he shall be saved out of it.
When the British and American people have been punished for hypocrisy then:
Ezek. 39:27, When I have brought them again from the people, and gathered them out of their enemies lands, and am sanctified in them in the sight of many nations.
The EAST will then be satisfied that the Great God who gave us all our wealth has suitably chastised us. That is the modern day 12 tribes of Israel. The Millions of us.
And who will be behind Germany controlling the scene? Modern day EDOM.
Esau originally had the birthright. The blessings which Britain and America have shared. Esau sold his birthright to Jacob for a pot of red soup. So Esau was changed to EDOM which means RED. Gen.25:25-34. His descendants were called EDOMITES.
The LORD decreed unto Rebekah that "the elder (Edom) shall serve the younger(Jacob)" but there would also come a time when Esau would indeed have the rule:
"And by thy sword shalt thou live, and shalt serve thy brother; and it shall come to pass when thou shalt have the dominion that thou shalt break his yoke from off they neck" Gen.27:40
EDOM now has the dominion over Jacob. Britain and America and the rest of the 12 Tribes are in colossal debt as indeed is the rest of the world. But the question is WHO has the dominion. It is the RED one or more accurately the ROTH one or even to be more precise Child of ROTH.
The END and The Beginning.
When Esdras (the Ezra of the Bible ) asked the Lord:
"What shall be the parting of the times: or when that be the end of the first, and the beginning of it that followeth?" 2nd Esdras 6, ( in the Apocrypha)
the angel answered him saying: "From Abraham unto Isaac, when Jacob and Esau were formed of HIM, Jacobs hand held first the heel of Esau. FOR ESAU IS THE END OF THE WORLD, AND JACOB IS THE BEGINNING OF IT THAT FOLLOWETH."
Britains role is to take on and deal with its owns problems (with GOD) that is its responsibility. No other nation on earth can help Britain. We repeat Britain must pull out of Europe and let Germany deal with its own responsibilities. The Rothschilds pipe dream of dominating the world with usury is over, all though they might not think so yet. Britain must bring back marriage and get to know its GOD again. Then the British will be filled with great visions of the future. As we go to print we have entered Kosova with Russia being difficult.
Alex Cain
Back in the early 1990's I had occasion to meet a zealous couple who, like myself, were staunch adherents of the sacred names Yahweh and Yahshua. They were visiting my sacred name friends in Huntington, Tn. When I attempted to point out to them that Yahweh Himself was not averse to referring to Himself as "Baal", ie. husband, or master of the house, the couple, particularly the wife, became extremely visceral, to the point of calling me an idiot and a fool.
She knew no Hebrew, had not studied the verses in question (Jer.31:32, Jer.3:14,20, etc.), nor the Holy Spirit's use of the word "ba'al" throughout the Hebrew scriptures. My point to them was simply that if Yahweh was at liberty to call Himself Israel's Baal (even though Baal was used by the heathen as a name for one of their gods), then how can it be wrong for us to call Him Lord.
Ironically, these people could assume a holier-than-thou superciliousness toward someone using the harmless, meaningful title "Lord", and yet not be disgusted and appalled at the carcinogenic cigarette smoke they sat there pumping into everyone's lungs, oblivious to the warning the Apostle Paul gave to anyone who would destroy the temple of Yah's Holy Spirit, 1 Cor 3:17. Then again, maybe they did not have the Holy Spirit, because Yahshua also warned that "whosoever shall say 'You fool' shall be in danger of Gehenna fire, spiritual damnation; Matt 5:22!"
I myself call regularly upon the Name of Yahweh, and refuse to substitute the pagan deity "Jesus" for that of our Saviour's Yahshua. I was re baptized into the Names by Sam Graham in Holt, Mich. in May of 1989, and the Holy Spirit has used me to convict a number of others to do the same. I shudder when preachers put "Lord" in place of "Yahweh" [going along with the grievous error of the translators] when reading passages of the O.T. And I have taught that since the Name of Yahweh occurs 16 times more often than "Adonai" (Heb. for Lord) in the 0. T., therefore true believers should mimic and follow the example set therein. The New Covenant sonship of the believer makes us "friends" of Yahweh--Like Abraham our father--hence, "I call you no longer servants (see John 15:15). This is another reason for calling the Creator by His first Name, His memorial Name Yahweh.
The Use of the Word "Baal" in the Old Testament
Of Sarah, wife of Abraham, it is said by Elohim Himself--"for she is ba'aled to a Baal"--meaning "married to an husband." The former occurrence is Strong's word #l166, the verb form means "to be married". The latter is the noun form of the word Baal.
Moses labelled Aaron and Hur "masters (ba'alim) of business matters." (Exod 24:14) Yahweh calls the priests the chief men (ba'alim again) among the children of Israel. Later in Israelite history in NW Europe and Britain, that term became "Lord". The House of Lords was the body of chief men and nobles elected to represent the nobility class. How very meaningful, then is the expression "Lord of Lords" when exalting the status and position of our soon-coming King, Yahshua. There is something very sick about an intellectualism that would rob us of such a designation for the Lord Yahshua. Also, "Lord Yahweh" [Adonai YHWH] occurs hundreds of times in the O.T. Prophets.
Proverbs 3:27 says we are not to withhold good from the ones to whom it is due [ba'alayv, meaning the owners thereof], when it is in the power of your hand to do it. This includes rendering unto Yahweh the titles, names, and things that belong unto Him Prov 12:4 says "a virtuous woman is a crown to her husband (Baal)." Three times in Prov 31 the virtuous woman's husband is called Baal. Isa 26:13 is interesting: "0 Yahweh Elohenu, other lords (adonayim) beside Thee have had dominion over us [ba'alnu]; but by Thee will we make mention of Thy Name."
This verse shows the different roles and functions of the nouns baai and adonai on the one hand, versus the names Yahweh and Elohenu. The use of adonayim in this text proves that the Houses of Yahweh in Abilene, TX. et. al. are wrong in claiming that adonai was added to the Hebrew Scriptures by idolatrous sopherim (scribes).
Isa 26:13's thought is echoed in the New Testament passage where Paul says even as there are many gods and many lords, nevertheless for us there is ONE GOD, the Father, out of Whom all is, and we for Him, and one Lord, Yahshua the Christ, through Whom all is, and we through Him." (II Cor 8:6)
It is true that Yahweh does not mean Lord; but He IS Lord. Why are so many sacred namers intent upon robbing the Hebrew, Greek and English languages of simple terms which mean nothing more than lord, owner, husband, master or sovereign.
If you say it is because the Greeks took the term adonai and named one of their gods "Adonis", or that the Canaanites took the word Baal from the Hebrew to name their deity Baai, and Exod 23:13 prohibits us from uttering these names, then my reply is that these words were introduced to Adam and Eve and their descendants long before the heathen misappropriated those words. Does the fact that cultish Masonic orders use the name Yahweh in some of their esoteric rites affect my right to use it?
I say that my brethren in the assemblies of Yahweh have a zeal for Elohim, but not according to knowledge (Rom 10:2). Being ignorant of scriptural Hebrew and etymology, they have gone about to establish their own righteousness. It is a righteousness based largely on pedantic misconstruing of words, and not on deeds and Truth. John 3:18 says it best:
My little children, let us not love in word, neither in tongue: but in deed and Truth.
Through deceit cloaked with covetousness bordering on idolatry (Col 3:5), the pastors and scholars of the sacred name movement have conveniently ignored Yahweh's sensible use of the word Baal and Adonai and rationalized around the simple fact that "Lord" is the most logical and poetically understandable equivalent in English.
How is it that a working stiff like myself is capable of pointing out the uses of ba'ai and adonai in this paper, and the full-time SN ministers Jacob 0. Meyer, Jacob Hawkins, Don Mansager, etc. have never noticed these things? Perhaps it is because they have a fiduciary interest in erecting as many walls as possible between themselves and the Church of God Sabbatarians.
Some, in order promote their own exclusivity, have gone so far as to accuse Yahweh of being unable to preserve the Masoretic Text inviolate. Not even the evangelical, fundamentalist Christians have done that. To suggest that thousands of times the scribes interpolated the terms adonai, elohim, and Baal into the copies of the Hebrew text, as many sacred namers assert, is to end up with no authentic, infallible record of the laws and history of Yah's people Israel. Thy Word is Truth.
Biblical numerology and gematria have converted atheistic mathematicians in Russia (such as Ivan Panin) to belief in the Hebrew and Greek texts of scripture. These mathematical anomalies would not even be there if you took away the terms that C.J. Koster and other SN scholars find offensive.
The attack on the textual integrity of scripture is tantamount to putting Yahshua Himself--Who is the Word of Elohim--back on the torture stake.[Any editing of the text done later by Ezra and Samuel the prophet was done only to make the text more sensible to later generations (for instance, names of places and towns changed over time), and did not change the meaning of the text.]
Isa 54:4-5 says:
You shall not remember the reproach of your widowhood any more,
for your Maker is your Husband (baal); Yahweh of Hosts is His Name.
Jer 3:14 says:
Turn, 0 backsliding children, says Yahweh; for I am married (ba'aled) to you. (Verse 20)" like as a wife treacherously departs from her husband (ba'ali), so have you dealt treacherously with Me (and My Word), 0 House of Israel."
Jer 31:32 says:
... although I (Yahweh) was an husband to them (ba'alti) , the children of
Israel broke My Covenant.
Again, if Yahweh can use the word/title Baal to refer to Himself, then the English speaking world is justified in using Lord as a title for either adonai or baal
Time-consuming studies of the origins of words (called etymology) such as holy ( We have a paper from a Hebrew scholar showing the origin of "holy" to be from the Hebrew word Hallel, having to do with praise). Lord, sacred, glory, divine, are largely irrelevant, because what matters is the meaning of these words in the mind of the modern-day hearer. Such pedantic sophistry may be seen in books like C.J. Koster's The Final Reformation. The effect of such "knowledge", if such it be, is to puff up the holder thereof (1 Cor 8:1), or failing that, to cause unnecessary division and strife over words. Worse yet, it severely handicaps the preaching of the good news to unbelievers.
I find Titus 1:15 relevant:
To the clean, all [words] is [are] clean, but to the defiled and unbelieving nothing is clean, but their mind and conscience is defiled.
Sad to say, Koster has defiled people's consciences toward innocent words.
The term Elohim--meaning mighty one--is often used as the last name, or surname, of the Creator, when used in conjunction with Yahweh (His proper or personal name). He is Yahweh Elohim, or Elohenu (our Might One). The term Elohim designates the kind of being, or class of being, that Yahweh belongs to. In that sense, men, angels, judges, and the gods of this world are all referred to as "Elohim"--in the generic sense-from Genesis to Malachi. As the Apostle Paul ( "Paul, being a Hebrew, wrote in Hebrew.' according to the highly respected Latin scholar Jerome in 420 A.D. Thus Paul would have used the terms Elohim and adonai in this passage). stated:
For though there be that are called gods, whether in heaven or in earth (as there be gods many, and lords many), but to us there is but one God, the Father... and one Lord, Yahshua the Messiah.
Hence, Paul is acknowledging here, as in the O.T., that there are many that are called Elohim, or gods, but for us there is but one Elohim--Yahweh Elohim. Whenever "god" is used to refer to the generic class of beings to which Yahweh belongs, this is not wrong in Yahweh's sight, because Elohim is also used to refer to other mighty ones. But we should not ascribe the glory and character of Yahweh's persona to other names which are not His Name. It is a matter of respect. Isa 42:8 says:
My Name is Yahweh, that is My Name, I will not give my glory to another [name], or my praise to idols.
When Christians use "God" as a name, saying, for example--"God made the heaven and the earth", or "God said to Moses"--this is wrong because in this instance, "God" is being used as a name, when that is not His name. Hence, we are giving His glory to an entity called "God--an idol among the Teutonic Germans. However, just as it is not wrong for Yahweh to use "Baal" as a noun or verb signifying marriage, lordship, ownership, or even denoting Yahweh's role towards His people, it is also not wrong to use "god" as a noun denoting the class of being which the term "god" connotes to the English-speaking mind. An example of a correct way to use the noun "god" would be the god of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. Here, we are clarifying and differentiating which God we are speaking of (not using it as a false name).
When discipling new believers, however, it is important to inform them of the distinct advantages and superiority of "Elohim" over "god." First, Elohim is plural and refers to the family name into which believers may be born. More than one individual can make up the family called Elohim (Eph 3:14-15). God is singular and misleads people into thinking there is only one individual in Elohim.
John 1 says "in the beginning was the Word and the Word (the Messiah) was with Elohim, and the Word was an Elohim. [The an is grammatically justifiable in the absence of the definite article]
Phil. 2:6-7 shows that Yahshua voluntarily emptied Himself of His elohimness, not grasping at or clinging selfishly to His status or position of equality with Father Elohim:
Let this mind be in you, which was in Christ Yahshua; Who, being inherently in the form of Elohim, deems it not pillaging to be equal with Elohim, nevertheless emptied Himself, taking the form of a slave, coming to be in the likeness of humanity, and being found in fashion as a human, He humbled Himself, becoming obedient unto death, even the death of the stake. [Phil 2:6-7--Concordant Literal N. T.]
Hosea 2:16b says Israel in the future shall no more call Yahweh Baali, my master. It seems to me that this has largely come to pass.
In that day, declares Yahweh, you will call me 'my husband' (ishi). You will no longer call me 'my master'(ba'ali) I will remove the names of the Baals from her lips; no longer will their names be invoked. (NIV)
It puzzles me how sacred namers include the word Lord with "the names of the Baals." I assure the reader that they are stretching the verse beyond anything Hosea had in mind, since he certainly was not familiar with the term lord.
We are told that since Baal can mean Lord, therefore this verse condemns the use of the term Lord. But wait a minute. By that reasoning, any word that means Lord would likewise be condemned, including sovereign, master, potentate, chief, nobleman.
When Hosea prophesies that Yah's people will no longer call Him 'my master', this reminds me of John 15:15, where Yahshua says He does not call us 'servants' any longer, but friends. The husband and wife relationship is that of best of friends. This is the essence of the message that Hosea is relating.
Let's analyse the sacred name reasoning another way. If the pagan god Molech means king, does that mean we stop using the term 'king'? Only vowel points distinguish 'melek' from Molech. No doubt the heathen Ammonites borrowed the Semitic term for king in naming their god Molech. The Canaanites did the same in labelling their idol Baal, borrowing from a term meaning master. This corruption does not prevent us from using the original legitimate nouns.
The KJV and RSV make clear the fact that it is the Baalim (not Yahweh) who will no longer be remembered by their name (Baal) [read Hosea 2:17 again]. So in a very real sense this verse has been fulfilled.
However, when translators, pastors, Christian and Jews use the terms Lord and Adonai as though they were names, or substitute those terms in place of His one memorial Name--thereby violating the clear-cut command not to "take away the Name of Yahweh Elohim" found in the 3rd Commandment--then they shall not be held guiltless. They are bringing the name of Yahweh to nothing.
Even the gargantuan scholar of the 1st Century, E. W. Bullinger, recognized the connection between the 144,000--the first fruits unto Yahweh and the Lamb (Rev 14:14)--and their being sealed in their foreheads with the actual names of the Father and Son. [Rev 14:1 should be "His and His Father's Names", according to the earliest manuscripts. Later copies inadvertently left out and His.]
Many Adventist and Church of God pew-warmers may be cutting themselves out of eligibility for the elect man-child company of Rev 12:5, 7:1-15 by their stubborn refusal to acknowledge, call upon, and glorify the Names of Yahweh and His Son Yahshua. One cannot "deny His [literal] Name" (see Rev 3:8, where the Greek literally means disown.) and expect to reap the blessing of the Philadelphians, which is to be kept "out of the hour of trial and tribulation that is about to be coming on the whole inhabited earth." (Rev 3:10--Concordant Literal N. T. )
Most Sabbath-keepers and Sunday-keepers have foolishly put their trust in the lying pen of the scribe-translators (Jer 8:8), and followed shepherds who feed them on deficient pastures. Jeremiah also warned about false prophets "who think to cause my people to forget Mv Name by their dreams."
I do not mean to imply that use of the actual Hebrew names guarantees one will be caught up with Yahshua and spared the time of trouble that follows. But I do believe the woman--the rank and file of the Churches--will have to learn more than they have been willing to about this subject during their 3 to 7 years in the wilderness. Ezek. 20:33ff says this about the Church's imminent wilderness ordeal:
As I live, says the Lord Yahweh, surely with a mighty hand, and with a stretched out arm [the same language used of the Egyptian Exodus], and with fury poured out, will I rule over you.
And I will bring you out from the peoples (the nations), and will gather you out of the countries wherein you are scattered ... and I will bring you into the wilderness of the nations [America's wilderness areas], and there will I plead with you face to face, like as I pleaded with your fathers in the wilderness of the land of Egypt, so will I plead with you, says the Lord Yahweh.
And I will cause you to pass under the rod, and I will bring you into the bond of the covenant; and I will purge out from among you the rebels, and them that transgress against me ... and you shall know that I am Yahweh.
The forty year sojourn of ancient Israel in the Sinai wilderness was "to humble them, to prove them and see what was in their heart, and whether they would walk in all of Yah's commandments or not" (Deut 8:2). The woman goes into the wilderness in Rev.12 during the Day of Yahweh for similar reasons. She will have to learn more about His statutes and judgments, which virtually none of the churches expound upon. Ezek. 11:19-20, 36:27 prove the Holy Spirit would be given at a later [New Covenant] time so that Yahweh's people might walk in His statutes and judgments.
The Final Reformation or The Ultimate Doctrinal Disaster for Yah's People
The book mentioned earlier, The Final Reformation, by the late C.J. Koster of S. Africa, deserves a more detailed rebuttal. The publication has caused quite a stir among some of the Sacred "separated" Name believers, due to which they are becoming more and more "separated"--from one another, and from Reality. There are a lot of facts in the book, but the conclusion that one must refrain from using terms like holy, sacred, lord, divine, god, hallowed, etc. because they have tainted origins in sun worship, has only served to further alienate the mentality of Yahweh's people from a sensible communication with a totally ignorant and uninformed world, to which we are all supposed to be effective witnesses. Had Satan planned to castrate the body of Yahshua, he could not have done a more efficient job than what Koster's book has done.
Here in America we speak English as it has come down to us from Latin, Greek and Hebrew. The word holy came by way of the Hebrew language, from the word halli, which means "to shout, holler or praise." It is the same word used in "Halleluyah." We today have received our English word "holler" from the Hebrew word hallel. The word "holy" or "hall?' simply meant "something to shout about." Therefore, the use of it in worship gave it the same connotation as "set apart"--that is, something set apart for praise and worship [the latter word has to do with showing the worth or worthiness of the One being worshipped]. Now, should we delete this word "Hallel" from our language simply because the pagans took it and used it in worship of their gods? I hardly think so. Yah is something to shout about, that's why we should always holler (hallel) to (lu) YAH (the Father).
In Hebrew "auor" means "light." From it we get the Latin and English word "aurora." But since there was, in Roman mythology, the "goddess of dawn" named Aurora, do you think we should strike the Hebrew word "auor" from the text?
The poetic form of Yahweh's Name--YAH--occurs by itself in Ps.68:4, plus at least three dozen other times. It means "I AM"--implying nothing outside Himself makes Him what He is. Also, it indicates He existed before the universe, before there was past or future time frames. There was only the present and Himself--I AM.
However, Webster's International Dictionary defines "Yah" as "an exclamation expressing disgust, contempt, defiance or derision." Then by the same reasoning that Koster uses in his book, the gullible people will soon be led to believe Halle lu Yah is wrong, as well as the "Yah" in front of "Weh"!!
Even if some words had their origins in sun-worship long ago, let us not forget that Yahweh in at least two scriptures chose to liken the Messiah to the sun itself, something that should give Koster and his followers pause. Mal 4:2 says:
But unto you that fear My name shall the Sun of Righteousness arise with healing in His wings.
Yahweh Elohim is a sun and a shield. (Ps 84:1 1)
Ps 19:5-6 is an allegory of the Second Coming of Yahshua the Bridegroom:
the sun is as a bridegroom coming out of His chamber rejoicing as a strong man to run a race. His going forth is from the end of the heaven, and His circuit to the ends of it.
Just as Yahshua is the Light of the world, the Light of the Gentiles, and "the true Light which lights every man that comes into the world." (John 1:9); the sun is so physically. From the beginning it was designed to symbolize the Saviour Yahshua. TO BE CONTD.
This "Rule of time" 28 page book is now ready. This book gives the pre Adamic period or origins. Dates from Adam in A.M. and B.C. Then switches to A.M. A.D. It has nearly 200 indexed entries. We are asking a donation of $10 or 5 to cover costs as it is a history book that is multi denominational. This will help to pass it on to people that cannot afford it. This book helps to solve the problem of what happened and when. It will be continually updated.