Updated 5th August 2008
Nowhere can we find Biblical indication that women are weaker mentally, emotionally or spiritually - as a matter of record, the contrary can be said, but let's just find out what "weaker vessel" really means:
"You husbands likewise, live with your wives in an understanding way, as with a weaker vessel, since she is a woman." (I Peter 3:7)
The Greek word used here as "vessel" refers to "frame or vessel of the human individual." A Greek lexicon states it this way; "a weaker vessel, as to or toward a weaker or more fragile vessel, one more easily broken or bent." Putting it all together, the Amplified Bible says this of I Peter 3:7;
"In the same way you married men should live considerately with (your wives), with an intelligent recognition (of the marriage relationship) honouring the woman as (physically) the weaker, but (realizing that you) are joint heirs of the grace of life."
There is no proof, medical or Scriptural, that women's development and physiological functions are in any way inferior to a man's. The erroneous teachings that imply women can not think as well as men on non-emotional levels is absolutely false. The Guinness Book of World records for 1994 lists Marilyn Vos Savant in the Hall of Fame for highest IQ.
As to female accomplishments and capabilities, we don't need to look further than our phone directories to find highly qualified, competent, and successful women as corporate managers, computer engineers, business owners, doctors, lawyers, professors, administrators, teachers and political leaders. It has also been often said that "behind every successful man is a successful woman" be it wife, mother or partner in business.
Most of us have been instructed from a child about the macho man, Samson. We've learned of Moses the meekest of men; David, the "man after God's own heart." We've learned the wisdom of Solomon and the faithfulness of Abraham. We have learned about the great deeds of our FOREFATHERS, but how many of us were taught about the achievements of our FOREMOTHERS ?
Herbert Lockyer compiled a biography of all "The Women of the Bible." This book can be obtained from most public libraries and bookstores, It is filled with dozens if not hundreds of inspiring and wonderful stories, explanations and examples of women who worshipped and served God. This book should be read to our children and studied by all Christians interested in coming to full appreciation of how God worked through women.
Aaron's sister Miriam was a prophet who led women in song and dance in the, very congregation. Israel heard the choir "Sing ye to the Lord" (Ex.15:20-21) as Miriam led all the women to praise God in the congregation of Israel. Deborah was a prophet and a JUDGE in Israel (Judges 4:4-24; 5:1-15) who also went into battle foretelling it's outcome.
HULDAH was a highly respected prophetess ( 2 Kings 22:14) who consoled King Josiah. King Josiah wanted to hear from someone who could speak for God concerning God's laws, statutes, and ordinances (2 Kings 22:1-20). Josiah also had access to Jeremiah (2 Chron. 35:25) and Zephaniah (Zeph.I:I) but he chose rather the woman Huldah to answer for the Lord.
Volumes have been written about RUTH, MIRIAM, SARAH, and even RAHAB. Their faithfulness, trust and obedience set the Standards for "virtuous women" for generations. Another powerful book for study is "Far Above Rubies" by Isabel Hin Elder who puts into perspective for the reader, just how vibrant and dedicated women of God have been.
Anna, (Luke 2:36) was a prophet serving God IN THE TEMPLE before Christ's ministry. She prophesied concerning John the Baptist. Because of Dorcas' service of help, God saw fit to bring her back from the dead (Acts 9:32-). And what of the "women of Galilee,"? Mary and Martha, vital helpers for Jesus and the apostles.
Philip the Evangelist had four "virgin" daughters "which did prophesy" (Acts 21:3-9). The Good News Bible translates this, "who proclaimed God's message." The Greek word prophesy" here in Acts 21, (#4395 in Strong's) means, "to foretell events, divinely speak under inspiration, exercise the prophetic office." No one told them to "keep silent."
In Acts 18:24-26 we read of Aquilla and his wife Priscilla and how they expounded unto Apollo "the way of God more perfectly," when he knew only of the baptism of John. In Rom. 16:3 Priscilla is now mentioned before her husband and is referred to by Paul as "my helpers in Jesus Christ." Most commentaries tell us that at this time Priscilla and Aquilla were legitimised as teachers AND EVANGELISTS.
While we are reading about Priscilla, it is interesting that many Bible scholars and theologians attribute far more to Priscilla than just being an Evangelist. Dr. Hornach, in his book "The Apostolic church" poses some difficult questions. Anyone acquainted with Paul's writings, the apostles typical opening and closings of each of his books, knows that each of his books is well "signatured" by him. Yet when one studies the book of Hebrews, no such "signaturing" is found. Historically Aquila and Priscilla lived just outside of Rome. Priscilla had our Israelite heritage and was well schooled in Hebrew law. For this reason and many others set forth in Dr.Hornach's book, Priscilla, a woman, may very well be the author of the Book of Hebrews.
Many other faithful, dedicated and brave women of the Bible did "exploits" for God. It is a profound reality that the Eternal God and Father, Jesus Christ and the apostles worked with and through many women. Is it now an unsanctioned and doctrinally correct position to assume that women are no longer to "prophesy," preach, teach or instruct others "in the way of God more perfectly"? Are women to "keep silent" not preach, teach or "prophesy" in God's churches of to-day ?
Reflective of the bias practised in to-day's society is an article written by Edward Fiske. In review of a book, entitled "The Church and the Second Sex" (1968) he makes the following statement;
"St. Paul ordered women to "keep silent in the churches." Tertullian in the 2nd century called women, "the gate which opened the way to the devil." St. Thomas later explained the birth of a female child as a generative mistake. Furthermore it was said that if Jesus had wanted female priests he would have chosen some female disciples.
Although this hostile attitude toward women has subsided in the past several years, few denominations accept women into the ministry. The results of this prejudice is that women are still dealt with strictly as second-class citizens, in the Roman Catholic Church - as well as in Anglican, Greek Orthodox, and the majority of Protestant churches. Where did this unfair practice come from ?
"By AD 43 women were not allowed to be presbyters (Council of Laodecia). Ordination of deaconesses continued but Apostolic Constitutions argues that they should refrain from preaching and baptizing; prayer becomes their primary liturgical function. The synod of Orleans (533) opposed their ordination in Gaul, but deaconesses were found elsewhere in the 11th century. Roman Catholic leaders, including John Paul II, stood adamantly against movements to ordain women priests as late as 1975," (New 20th Century Encyclopaedia of Religious Knowledge; Women Ordination of, pp 875-877).
Essentially this Encyclopaedic dissertation declares that prior to AD 343, women WERE "presbyters" (ordained priests, ministers and elders) actively engaged in "preaching and baptizing." It also points out who stopped this practice ! It clearly states that "Ecclesiastical tradition and social mores, as well as scriptural reasons, have stood between women and ordained office."
Before discussing the "scriptural reasons" for this biassed view, let us clearly understand where and when this practice began. What is the basis for these "Ecclesiastical traditions and social mores?"
"The church fathers of the second through fourth centuries being among those who agitated against women's independence, decreed that women could only minister to other women. Male leaders reserved for themselves the right to serve the whole church in the more important and powerful roles, such as elder and bishop and adhered to the ideal of the monarchical episcopate -Polycarp, writing to the Philippines around 110 CE, attempted to limit women's behaviour by clearly delineating their "roles" (The Oxford Companion to the Bible, pages 814-817)
Most Bible dictionaries, encyclopaedias and commentaries support the dates and circumstances recorded above. Apparently, from about AD 343 to this century, the downgrading of women has continued with zeal. What was woman's place prior to AD 343?
"The Oxford Companion to the Bible (pages 806-818) under the heading "WOMEN" has a fairly complete history of women's role in the church, it says:-
"The actions of Jesus of Nazareth toward women were therefore revolutionary. He did not hesitate to engage even unclean foreign women in public conversation, (John 4:27) He ignored all strictures of ritual impurity, (Mark 5:25-43). He himself taught women, (Luke 10:38) gave them equal rank with men as daughters of Abraham, (Luke 10:38-42).
He openly ministered to them as "children of wisdom" (Luke 7:35-50), and afforded them the highest "respect as persons" (Matt.5:28). Women belonged to the inner circle of the disciples (Luke 8:13), and they were attested as the first witnesses of the resurrection (Luke 24:1-11, John 20:18). The fourth gospel begins and ends with the testimony of a woman to the Christ (John 4:29, 20:18). The article goes on to say;
"Women therefore played a leading role in earliest Christianity, being baptized and receiving the Spirit;( Acts 1:14; 5:14; 8:12; 16:15) doing acts of charity (Acts 9:36) suffering imprisonment for their faith (Acts 8:3; 9:1-2) and serving as ministers of the church (Rom.16:1-7). They were allowed to preach and pray in worship (1 Cor. 11:5) as well as to prophesy (Acts 21:8-9) and to teach (Acts 18:25-26). Their equal status in Christ was strongly affirmed by Paul, who considered the ancient subordination of women in Gen.3:6 to have been overcome in Christ (Gal. 3:27-28)."
Let us fully grasp what this is telling us; First of all, Jesus Christ NEVER responded to women as a second-class citizen or as a person inferior to a man. He ministered to them as "children of wisdom" and equal inheritors of Abraham. Secondly, Paul also treated women as equal to men in the body of Christ - there was no prejudice or bias shown to ANY woman, and; thirdly, women were afforded the opportunity to pray, preach, teach and prophesy in public meetings, as we have just seen from the history of the "early church."
What were the practices toward women of the "early church" during the Apostle Paul's lifetime? Did Paul in any way discourage, curtail, or put an end to women performing ministerial functions ? Quoting again from the same reference;
"Thus in pre-Pauline and Pauline Christian communities, women appear to have functioned almost identically to men. In fact, it is possible that more women then men were house-church leaders, hosting vital prayer meetings that became the kernel of the movement. At least one woman deacon, Phoebe is recorded in the New Testament (Rom. 16:1-2) and is functioning as an official teacher and mission in the church of Cenchreae. Eusdia and Syntyche from Philippi, (Phil.4:2-3)'were prominent leaders of that community, and Junia served the church at Rome as an Apostle (Rom.16:7).
The most prominent woman in the New Testament is Prisca/Priscilla who worked-alongside her husband and was probably the more renowned of the pair (l Cor.16:19; Rom.16:3-4; Acts 18). The woman Mary, Tryphaena, Tryphosa, and Persis in Rom 16 'are described as having laboured (KOPAIN) for the Lord, the same term Paul used to describe his own evangelizing and teaching activities." Jesus Christ, the Apostle Paul, and those of the "early church" accepted women functioning in official ministerial capacities.
We have also seen that Philip the Evangelist had "four daughters who proclaimed God's message" along with Phoebe and Priscilla. The evidence supporting women who were gifted with the Spirit of Prophecy or a ministerial chaffing is overwhelming.
What are those scriptural reasons that seem to contradict the facts already presented ? Does the Bible contradict itself ? Did Paul change women's role in the church ? Or, is there another answer to these so-called conflicting passages of scripture ?
To understand the truth of God's word, we can not harbour preconceived opinions, ideas or beliefs. Our acquired learning will become excess baggage and we may subconsciously try to fit these beliefs into the true explanation, and thereby, overlook something we need to see.
AS AN EXAMPLE; we have been taught that I Cor. 11:5-16 is all about "AUTHORITY" We have been instructed that the Apostle Paul is demonstrating the "chain-of-command" within these few verses. We have been instructed that he is showing that an women are to be subordinated to men. What if that teaching is really not at all what these verses are actually saying ?
Have we been "programmed" to believe that these verses supposedly prove "authority" in the church ? what if that programming was a deliberate deception ? Are we willing to study these verses with a clean slate and a willingness to come to THE REAL TRUTH, even if it's different than our personal belief ?
Throughout the book of Corinthians, Paul was stressing the "order of things." He sought Gods order versus man's confusion, whether it be from men or women, especially in the church environment. In the letters to the Corinthians and to Timothy and Titus, Paul was calling to men and women to not add any confusion to the body. As he directed in I Thess. 5:22; "Abstain from all appearances of evil."
There were many problems within the body of the Corinthian church. The Jewish converts did not like Paul and even took him to court (Acts 18:1-17) to have him run out of town. On the other side were the Greek converts who favoured Apollo's rather than Paul. These Greeks were influenced by the oracles of Delphine across the bay from Corinth. As a consequence there arose many "contentions" and bickering among them.
Paul could not even reason with them as adults but as "babes" (Chap.3:1-3; 18-22; 4:6-8; 14:17, 21) and as "carnal." With this in mind, let's take another look at the book of First Corinthian.
Paul was WARNING these unruly MEN and asking them if they wanted him to come to them with a ROD (Chap.4:14, 21). Then, throughout the entirety of 1st Cor. he debates each problem and question with them. The scene and subject matter had NOT changed by the time we get to Chap. 11. Now notice verses 16 and 17:
"But if any MAN seem to be contentious, we have no such custom, neither the churches of God. Now in this that I declare unto you, I praise you not, that ye come together, not for the better, but for the worse"
We must not overlook that Paul is addressing the MEN who "seem to be contentious." There is no mention here about women causing some kind of a problem. Observe also that whatever the "contention" was, it had to do with a "CUSTOM" that NO OTHER church of God had.
This "custom" appears to be something to do with HEAD COVERINGS. Notice verse 4; "Every MAN praying or prophesying, having HIS head covered, dishonureth HIS head." So it seems that the subject of Chap.11 has to do with "contentious men" who are practising some sort of custom where THEY were covering THEIR heads. That is the subject of Chap.11:6-17, NOT "authority" in the church.
What then was this "head covering" the men were practising? Quoting from The Encyclopaedia of the Jewish Religion, page 101 under "covering of the head" "The Jews of Babylonia stressed the importance of covering the head - it is an outstanding example of CUSTOM asssuming the force of law ----- The prevalent CUSTOM among strictly orthodox Jews is to keep their heads covered at all times.
Now quoting from The Oxford Companion to the Bible. pages 134-5, under the subject of "The Epistles to the Corinthians" we read:
"The practice of certain Christian men at Corinth of wearing head coverings while praying and prophesying (1 Cor. 11:4) probably mirrors the widespread custom of wearing devotional head coverings during worship."
The subject matter and teaching of Paul then, had nothing to do with "authority" as much as with the CUSTOM of men wearing head coverings. So to clarify this whole issue, he directed them to follow the EXAMPLE of how a woman's hair SHOWS SUBMISSION to her head, but for a man to wear a shawl or a "mitre" was dishonouring Christ, the man's "head."
While we have been bedazzled with the misinterpretation of 1st Cor.11, our teachers have quickly glossed over verse 5 as if it were not there. Let us go back and read verse 5 and accept exactly what it DOES SAY, about what a woman SHOULD DO but do it with her head covered; "but every woman that prayeth or prophesieth "
Throughout the book of Corinthians, Paul was constantly dealing with problems
that were causing "strife and divisions". In Chaps.12, 13, and 14, there was
conflict about spiritual gifts and speaking in tongues. By Chap.14 verse 20, he
again refers to them as "children in understanding," as he had done in 3:1-3.
Verse 40 of Chap. 14 indicates that their church services were not peaceful,
orderly, or even "decent" when he told them; "Let all things be done decently
and in order"
In verse 33, Paul has to remind the congregation that "God is not the author
of confusion." So we see that within the body of this discussion about their
Spiritual gifts, the problem extant was that of DISORDER, CONFUSION and
IMPROPER BEHAVIOUR of some of the members.
Notice also that within Chap. 14 we have the outline or pattern of correct
and "peaceful" church participation and what is considered to be proper
behaviour;
"when ye come together, everyone of you hath a psalm, hath a doctrine, hath a
tongue, hath a revelation, hath an interpretation. Let all things be done unto
edifying (verse 26). If anything be revealed to another that sitteth by, let the
first hold his peace" (verse 30)
It seems from the text, that there were people both men and women, causing
disruption. Plainly Paul is telling them not to all talk at the same
time. He is directing them to be polite, courteous and condescending.
Then in verse 36 he throws out a bit of sarcasm by telling them that they
personally did not generate the truth of God.
Verses 34 and 35 Paul addresses the woman's part of this overall "disorder".
Quoting from "The Evangelical Commentary on the Bible," pages 980-981, one (can
begin to understand what was actually going on:
"The words, 'if they want to inquire about something' appear to point to a
certain KIND of speaking that was proving itself as disruptive within
Corinthian worship as, the unrestrained exercise of other kinds of speech, and
which was associated in this particular congregation with women. Paul's
instruction is that such women 'should remain silent in the churches' ( the
Greek words here are more accurately translated 'in the meetings of the
church'). 'They are not allowed to speak' (in the disrespectful and disruptive
way that they are doing') for 'it is disgraceful' (see 11:7 where the same Greek
word is used of some women who refuse to cover their head as a sign of respect)
for a woman to speak (in this way) in the church' (verse 35)."
Paul's indirect impariture in verse 34, "Let your women keep silent (SIGAO)
must be taken in conjunction with the surrounding text. He says, for it is
(LALEIN) which should be taken to mean "uttering sounds that are incoherent and
which are not understood by others" Paul uses the SAME WORD for "keeping silent"
in verse 38 when a MAN speaks in an' unknown tongue without an interpreter. Also
the same Greek word SIGAO "let HIM keep silent" is used in verse 30; "if
anything be revealed to another that sitteth by, let the first hold his peace".
Actually, that phrase, "let him hold his peace" is the same word meaning "let
HIM KEEP SILENT!" That is directed to the men, not the women.
What Paul is saying is that only one man must speak at a time, otherwise there
will be confusion. That "Let him keep silent" is therefore qualified even as the
SIGATOSAN of verse 34 in the case of the woman. So it can be accurately stated
that not only was a woman to "keep silent" BUT men ALSO WERE TOLD TO "KEEP
SILENT'.
We must keep in mind that if Paul were insisting that women were now NOT
going to be allowed to "pray" or "prophecy" in the churches, he would have most
assuredly clarified that in Chap. II verse 5, we see here in Chap. 14, the
directive is given to a few women who were obviously being disruptive,
disorderly, discourteous, and interrupting those who were speaking (verse 30).
Paul is not contradicting himself in any way, but calling for better behaviour
on the part of a few people.
Perhaps it was simply the frustrated speech of wives whose soft-spoken
questions were ignored by husbands, or perhaps the bolder speech of women who
ignored their husbands entirely and were interrupting to ask questions of the
person who was speaking. In any case, it was causing disorder and confusion and
Paul is telling them, "let all things be done decently and in order" (verse 40).
Ephesus was a major port across the Aegean Sea from Corinth. It was on the
trade route from Greece into Asia. Timothy was a young man well suited to
dealing with the problems of the Ephesus church. His mother was a Jewess and his
father of Greek descent (Acts 16:1-3) a similar mix of those people in the
church.
Apparently there were certain persons in Timothy's area that were teaching
falsehoods and "fables" Within the first few verses of I Tim. chap. 1, we can
easily focus on what Paul's main concerns were:
"... charge some that they teach no other doctrine, neither give heed to
fables ... from which some having swerved, have turned aside unto vain jangling;
desiring to be teachers of the law, understanding neither what they say, nor
whereof they affirm ..." (parts of verses 3,4,6 and 7)
What were these "fables" he was referring to, and who was it that was
spreading this controversy and "vain jangling"? Notice in 4:7 these "fables" are
referred to as "old wives fables". Then, finally in Chap. 5 verses 11 through
15, we are given a clue as to whom these certain persons might have been:
"But the younger widows refuse; for when they have begun to wax wanton
against Christ, they will marry: having damnation, because they have cast off
their first faith. And withal they learn to be idle, wandering about from house
to house; and not only idle, but tattlers also and busybodies, speaking things
they ought not... for some are already turned aside after Satan."
Just as in Corinth, Paul was addressing some very specific local problems
Timothy was having to confront. As a "father to Timothy, who tells him to "give
attendance to reading, to exhortation, to doctrine." He was also advised in
"avoiding profane and vain babbling" (6:20), possibly from some young widows.
"Let the WOMAN learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman
to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence" (1
Tim.2:11-12)
Let's take note of a few word usages here; first, it says WOMAN, singular
female and better translated as "A WIFE". The word "silence" is #2271 in
Strong's meaning "desistance from bustle, stillness, quietness, or "peaceable"
as in Acts 22:20. The word subjection #5292 means "subordination" or to "place
in proper order". The words "usurp authority" is #831 and means "DOMINATE".
Verse 12 is also poorly translated in the KJV. It should NOT be "But I suffer
not a woman to teach," but "I suffer not a wife"... (GUNE) or A WIFE as in verse
11. Paul says, "I do not permit a wife to teach". The word for "teach" is
DIDASKEIN in the present tense which means to teach continuously, or better
translated "I do not want a wife to constantly teach". Assuming that if she did
she would undermine her husband's position and give the appearance that she was
the head. NOT GOOD PR.
Clearly we see that a woman or wife was creating a "bustle" and trying to
"dominate" men while in the practice of teaching. Those few are told to be
still, but that particular woman or wife should "desist from" bustle. The
"Garner-Howes Commentary" has this to say about verses 11-14;
"this learning in quietness simply means without being contentious or
belligerent. The woman is to learn in modest quietness respecting the authority
of the instructor -- this does not mean she is to be a coward slave, speaking or
remaining dumb all her life, nor does it infer that the woman can never speak or
ask questions in a teaching and learning session in the church" (Gen.3:16, Eph.
5:27, Col. 3:18, Titus 2:5). "To teach, not indeed to 'exercise authority (over)
a man'. This refers to public teaching in a capacity that would usurp authority
(and to dominate) the man -- hence in matters of teaching judgement, (the woman)
is instructed to be in quietness, not boisterous, or contentious for a point."
What we need to understand is that Paul's directives are primarily concerned
with women DOMINATING men' actively taking over the man's authority and doing it
in a disruptive way. This is precisely what he was saying in I Cor. 14:34-35.
There is no contradiction of scriptures! The same Apostle who told women not to
dominate or take-over men's authority, also wrote, "but every woman THAT PRAYETH
OR PROPHESIETH" should DO IT with her head covered, showing publicly that she is
teaching or praying while in subjection to her head (1 Cor.11:15).
Christianity brought new hope and freedom to women who had lived within
extremely male dominated societies. There were some localized abuses of this
freedom by a few women who may have begun to assert themselves more forcefully
than what was discrete. Here were also some men disrupting the meetings. Such
conduct would have brought shame to the new churches and would have created a
stumbling block to new converts.
In I Cor.14 and I Tim. where Paul mentions that Eve was "deceived" and placed
in subjection to the man, he was not implying that "the fall" was Eve's fault.
Paul states otherwise in Rom.5:12-21, showing that Adam was to blame.
Just as Adam shared the blame with Eve, so we all must share the blame for
continuing the erroneous teaching which prevents women from developing their
spiritual gifts and talents. Obviously we have all been deceived and tricked
into believing a lie.
Truly there have been "false prophets also AMONG the people" and there "shall
be false teachers among you" (2 Pet. 2: 1).
A prophetic statement about young women and ladies who serve God is quoted in
Acts 2:17-18 and also in Joel:
"And it shall come to pass in the last days, saith God, I will pour out of my
Spirit upon all flesh: and your sons and your daughters shall
prophesy (preach) and your young men shall see visions, and your
old men shall dream dreams. And on my servants and on my handmaidens I
will pour out in those days of - my Spirit; and they SHALL prophecy"
The Greek word "prophesy" is #4395 in Strong's and literally means "to speak
under divine inspiration, foretell events, exercise the prophetic office" God
says he SHALL bring it about. Brethren, if we refuse to allow "daughters" or HIS
"handmaidens" to speak publicly, are we not hindering God's work ?
"For ye are all the children of God -- There is neither Jew nor Greek, there
is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are
all one in Christ Jesus" (Gal.3:26-28)
Not all of us, male or female have been called to "teach, preach or
prophesy," but we each have a job to do. Our Father has equipped us to do that
job with Spiritual gifts. Let us now step up to that responsibility whatever it
may be and begin to do EXPLOITS for our Great God. Let us also be keenly
aware that we WILL be HEARING "your daughters" and
God's "handmaidens" prophesying in the churches of God. THAT IS
HIS WILL!
We would like to thank Martin Myron of Patriots of the Kingdom for passing
this work to us--keep up the good work Martin.
Alex Cain
NEW READERS Please note if you do NOT want to carry on receiving the
Countdown
Magazine please let us know and we apologize in advance for any inconvenience
caused--
Editor
If you use WP 6.0 for DOS or can convert we will be quite happy to let you
have all past material. We will send you the discs. Otherwise patience is
required. Send for latest list of free articles.
Phone international: (*) 44 (0)1252 547397
(*) code out of Your Country
44 into Britain
(0) local only
Please not after 2200 hrs or 10 o'clock GMT
E-mail id: alexander.cain@cableol.co.uk
Copyright© Church of God 1997
While the driver was made the scapegoat has anyone asked the question; IF he
had had a drink could someone have spiked it?
It is highly likely again that the Queen has been badly advised. Whereas the
rest of the world knows that she is sitting on the throne of David she
apparently is not aware of this or plays it down. Naturally she was concerned
about her offspring and wanted to have offspring for them i.e. someone to
continue sitting on the throne.
If she had been aware that she was sitting on the throne of David then she
would have known that someone would have been provide by GOD. Jer. 34:17 "For
thus saith the Lord; David shall never want a man to sit upon the Throne of the
house of Israel." In Princess Diana, God provided the most beautiful baby maker
the world has ever seen. God has kept HIS promise.
Her funeral was watched by billions, the Americans were once again captivated
by the mystic of Monarchy. A power given by GOD. A calm decended upon England
and the world watched transfixed as it became obvious to all that she was the
worlds fairytale princess as the British packed London with themselves and the
flowers as a mark of respect, this was the people telling the establishment "you
have made a mistake".
The south of England was bathed in calm weather and glorious sunshine as the
funeral process was gone through and she was very carefully taken to her rest.
The world was actually stunned as it was slowly revealed how much a "light of
the world" she was and how she had physically demonstrated "the way to go."
Grieving for the general public should be finished after one month, for the
relations it will take two years or longer.
Princess Diana was the fairy princess that had fallen from grace with the
establishment but had made contact with the grassroots people, we will
see her again.
Princess Diana was finally hounded to her death by the media in an
"accident" with the paperazzi. The Rockefellers the Rothschilds, the Khazars and
Edomites, Hollywood and the Media in general and others have all to share for
the blame of her death. She knew too much.